Legal Opinion

Fielder v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 21, 1986No. HEY-2-2201-481-5; CA A33752Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) which determined that she was not entitled to additional benefits with respect to her Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) grant. Petitioner contends that AFSD illegally combined her grant with her male housemate’s by forming one assistance unit, which had the effect of reducing benefits for petitioner and her children. She claims that the order is based on a rule which we declared invalid as applied in Sapp v. AFSD, 64 Or App 353, 668 P2d 441 (1983), a case with similar facts.

Petitioner shares a household with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sapp v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API