Legal Opinion

W.H. Farner v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., and Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, a Partnership

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1984No. 82-1647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

W.H. Farner brought this diversity action against Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman's Fund) and two law firms, asserting claims arising out of two prior lawsuits not a part of these proceedings. The district court concluded that all of Farner’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations and granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The undisputed facts giving rise to this suit are as follows. In 1973, Timothy Bieri suffered severe, permanent physical injuries while he was a guest at a New Mexico…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Franco v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Citizens State Bank of Dickinson v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neylan v. MoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Richardson v. DenendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Fortenberry v. Glock, Inc.(USA)Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Sharts v. NatelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Reyes Castillo v. Cantera Ramos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API