Legal Opinion

Crusco v. Fisher & Brother, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 3, 1978No. 78 Civ. 1149 (JMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANNELLA, District Judge:

Motions by plaintiffs, for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment, are denied.

Motion by defendant Fisher & Brother, Inc., to confirm the December 14, 1977 award of Arbitrator Thomas A. Knowlton, is granted.

Motion by defendant Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Ameri-ca, for summary judgment, is granted.

The complaint is dismissed.

FACTS

This is a labor dispute. Defendant Fisher & Brother, Inc. [“Fisher”] is a moving and storage company with a place of business in New York City. Defendant Local 814,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William R. Freeman v. Local Union No. 135 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Conran v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Del Casal v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1979
  4. Phillips v. Lenox Hill HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. David Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API