Legal Opinion

Willis v. Holley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1996No. 83839PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs have an easement by prescription over a roadway on defendant’s land. We find they have not acquired an easement.

I. FACTS

The plaintiffs, John E. and Barbara Willis (collectively “the Willises”), own the land adjacent to that of the defendant, Wanda J. Holley (Holley). About 1949, plaintiffs’ predecessor, Mr. Martin, began using a roadway over the Holly farm to access what is now the Willises’ farm. Mr. Martin sold his land to Mr. Gray. Then the Willises bought the land in 1993. The Willises and their predecessors have used the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irion v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Friend v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Zimmerman v. NewportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Loris v. PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Cookson v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Akin v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API