Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hasselrode v. Gnagey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1961No. Appeal, No. 236Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno:

The purpose of law is to achieve justice; the purpose of language is to convey the meaning of the persons using it; the purpose of the courts is to plumb the depths of reality and on the unbudgeable foundation of established fact found a proper judgment. The record does not demonstrate that these three desiderata have found fulfillment in the case at bar. The following are the essentials in the matter. The plaintiff Fred L. Hasselrode was injured when the automobile in which he was a guest and being driven by a Frank R. Carnegie, was struck by a truck…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Hegmann v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API