Legal Opinion

Cole v. Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1979No. 78-188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Hoi.t, Justice.

Appellees and appellants were owners, as tenants in common, of 346 acres of land. Appellees sought a partition, alleging the lands were susceptible to division and, if found not to be, the property should be sold at public auction and the proceeds partitioned according to the parties' respective interests. In response, it was appellants’ position that the lands could not be divided in kind and, therefore, should be sold at public auction. The chancellor, as requested by the appellees, appointed Commissioners to view the lands and determine whether the acreage was capable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. RummellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Robinson v. ChampionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Fortuna v. AchorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Padgett v. HastonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Powell v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Rahat v. GolmirzaieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Powell v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Swinson v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API