Cardenti v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Adjudged guilty upon an indictment charging in four counts, all under the internal revenue law (26 USCA), illegal acts pertaining to the maintenance of a still and the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, defendants bring error.
The point most earnestly urged is that the court should have suppressed the larger part of the evidence, because, as alleged, it was procured by an unlawful search and seizure. The indictment was filed on June 27,1927, and on July 7th the defendants were arraigned and pleaded not guilty, whereupon the cause was set down for trial on August 2d.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Segurola v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- MacDaniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Goodfriend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- McCurry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robison v. Superior Court of the City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tomoya Kawakita v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- State v. EganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Robison v. Superior Court of the City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.