Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Muse

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2006No. A-05-947Published

1DissentIrwin, Judge

The record presented on appeal fails to demonstrate that the operative information was ever properly filed before Muse’s trial was held, and such failure creates a jurisdictional defect which makes the trial court’s convictions and sentences void. Additionally, the majority’s holding creates potential speedy trial problems. For those reasons, I respectfully dissent and conclude that this court should reverse.

As the majority notes, the issue presented in this appeal is whether Muse’s convictions and sentences can be sustained based on the record presented. Muse argues that the second amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Langford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API