Odom v. Little Rock & I-85 Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants, as there were material issues of fact as to (1) whether NCNB breached the option agreement upon which the closing was based and (2) whether NCNB defrauded plaintiffs at the closing by falsely representing to them that the loan funds were to be used for improvements on the property. As will appear, we have concluded that summary judgment was correctly entered.
*245NCNB could not have breached the option agreement, because it was not a party to that contract. The option was entered into by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cofield v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- McLain v. Shenandoah Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Foster v. SneadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Odom v. Little Rock & I-85 Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980