Legal Opinion

Harr v. North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 14, 2023No. 5:23-cv-00577Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:23-CV-577-D SIDNEY B. HARR, | ) Plaintiff, , v. ; ORDER NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, ) Defendant. ; On October 13, 2023, Sidney B. Harr (“Harr” or “plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, filed this action against the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH” or “defendant”) [D.E. 1]. Harr paid the filing fee. Harr named Crystal Gail Mangum (“Mangum”) as a co-plaintiff, but: Mangum did not sign the complaint. See [D.E..1] 33. On October 16, 2023, Harr moved to amend…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API