Legal Opinion

Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. Tok Hwang

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2017No. 7164 S-16132PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A sublessee entered into an agreement containing an option to purchase the lessee’s interest in the lease and leasehold improve ments. When the sublessee attempted to exercise the option the lessee declined to sell, claiming the option was unenforceable. The sublessee sued, seeking, among other things, to enforce the option provision. The superior court held that the provision was too uncertain to enforce either as an option or as an agreement to negotiate. The sublessee appeals; we affirm the superior court’s decision.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Tok Hwang…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ansorge v. KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Resqsoft, Inc. v. Protech Solutions, Inc. and State of Alaska, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. SMJ Gen. Constr., Inc. v. Jet Commercial Constr., LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Gavora, Inc. v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Austin J. Joy Jr. and Regena S. Joy v. Randy Hahn and Best Split Firewood, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API