Legal Opinion
Lacy v. Laurentide Finance Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1972No. Civ. 13235PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, J. *
The appeal is by plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. The complaint was in two counts, one pleading false imprisonment, the other was labeled an action “for abuse of process” but misnamed.
Statement of Facts
The records of the Municipal Court of the Sacramento Municipal Court District, County of Sacramento, show that on September 27, 1967, Lauren-tide Finance Corporation (“Laurentide”) brought therein a “Complaint for Money” against plaintiffs herein (“Lacys”). A writ of attachment issued, the salary of Mrs. Lacy was garnisheed on November 2, 1967, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Meadows v. Bakersfield Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Porten v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hooks v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.