Legal Opinion

Mega Construction Corp. v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-01728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GOLDBERG, District Judge.

This case involves a defense and indemnification insurance coverage dispute stemming from a construction site accident. Presently before the Court are the cross-*650motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs, Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey (“Harleysville”) and Mega Construction Corporation (“Mega”), and Defendant, Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Quincy”). For reasons set forth below, we conclude that Quincy was obligated to defend and indemnify its insured. We also conclude that sufficient facts exist that could establish that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. REPUBLIC FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  4. Wang v. Allstate Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API