Legal Opinion

Mills v. Mills

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 3, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

When the chancellor heard, finally, the appellant’s suit against appellee for divorce, he dismissed the bill without prejudice because of his conviction that the former was not a resident of this State; hence, the court had no jurisdiction of the cause. It was appellant’s burden to prove that he had resided in the State ninety days before filing his bill of complaint (Sec. 65.02 Florida Statutes, 1941, F.S.A. Sec. 65.02) else there could have been no jurisdiction, hence’no adjudication.

We have studied closely the testimony of the appellant about his intention to change his domicile…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gipson v. GipsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. RouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  2. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Yost v. YostNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. Feuer v. FeuerSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API