Legal Opinion

People v. Sweeper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2010PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]). Defendant failed to establish a step one prima facie case of racial discrimination (id. at 94-97; People v Decker, 15 NY3d 625 [2010]). Defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender is barred by Almendarez-Torres v United States (523 US 224 [1998]; see People v Bell, 15 NY3d 935 [2010] [decided today]). Defendant’s remaining contentions are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. People v. HeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. PhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. SwiftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. MattisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API