Legal Opinion

In Re Richardson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2003No. 49S00-0203-DI-174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

We find today that by continuing to prosecute a lawsuit in order to burden a third party and by falsely answering interrogatories in order to conceal his own assets, the respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and should be suspended from the practice of law.

This case commenced upon the Disciplinary Commission’s verified complaint for disciplinary action against respondent Scott I. Richardson. The matter proceeded to hearing before a hearing officer appointed by this Court. The hearing officer conducted a full evidentiary hearing and has now tendered to this…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re RelphordeIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re BridenhagerIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re MellingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In the Matter of Giannetto.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Koch Law Firm, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. In the Matter of: Arthur J. Usher, IVIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Scott Richardson v. Koch Law Firm, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API