Legal Opinion
Barrera v. Town of Brownville
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 18, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00159PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Town of Brownville and James Catlin (Docket # 8). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
A federal court grants summary judgment “if ... there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Pursuant to the Local Rules, the Court has “no independent duty to search and consider any part of the record.”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Dynamic Image Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Larrabee v. Penobscot Frozen Foods, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. Heritage Salmon, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Canales v. University of Phoenix, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2012