Legal Opinion
Smith v. Heritage Salmon, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 11, 2002No. 2:01-cv-00046PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs sued their former employer for retaliatory discharge and related acts. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 6). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Pursuant to Rule 56(c), summary judgment is appropriate when the record reveals no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). An issue is “genuine” if a reasonable jury, drawing favorable inferences, could resolve it in favor of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Feliciano De La Cruz v. El Conquistador Resort & Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Rachel L. FENNELL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FIRST STEP DESIGNS, LTD, D/B/A Hand-In-Hand, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Osher v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEMDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Bishop v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Hornof v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- BEER v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.