Schrand v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to a former employee of the defendant Federal Pacific Electric Company under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.1 After approximately 17 years as an employee of Federal Pacific, the plaintiff, Carl Schrand, was terminated in 1983 at age 62. A jury awarded Schrand $41,326 and found that Federal Pacific acted willfully in terminating him. On this basis the district court awarded “liquidated damages,” as provided by the Act, doubling the award to $82,652. The district court denied…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haskell v. Kaman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Joe E. Cooper, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Clarence F. Davis v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Perlean Griffin v. Carleton FinkbeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Wyvill v. United Companies Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Wayne v. Village of SebringCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Abbott Laboratories, Andrew J. Muetterties and Joseph N. Genese, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. John F. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.