Lewis v. Carr
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
This is an action brought by appellants to quiet title to a group of mining claims, 14 in number, situated in the Tonopah mining district. Respondents claimed possession and right of possession to all except one of said claims by virtue of relocations. The relocations of the claims in question were made upon the belief that the required amount of assessment work for the year ending July 1, 1924, had not been performed upon the claims. It was stipulated by counsel at the trial that appellants’ locations were valid, and also that the relocations were legally made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bishop v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Farwell v. NeedhamOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Golden Giant Mining Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pinkerton v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959