Barton v. Hobbs
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against Ernest Hobbs and Charles R. Hobbs, a partnership doing business as E. E. Hobbs & Son, for damages resulting from injuries sustained in a cave-in of a sewer ditch. At the close of the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendants. After argument on the motion for a new trial, the trial court sustained the motion and granted a new trial. The defendants Hobbs have appealed. Earthworms, Inc., was made a party defendant for subrogation purposes as the employer of the plaintiff to whom it has paid compensation under the workmen’s compensation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Anderson v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Bingaman v. Estate of BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Mansfield v. Andrew Murphy & SonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Fritchley v. Love-Courson Drilling Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cruz v. LopezNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Rudolf v. Tombstone Pizza Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Schwartz v. Riekes and SonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Josh Kaul v. Wisconsin State LegislatureWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.