Shaffer v. Hohenschild
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Saline district court; R. F. Thompson, judge. Action on a promissory note by H. Holienscliild against W. H. Shaffer and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring the case to this court.
Read the full summary
Memorandum. — Error from Saline district court; R. F. Thompson, judge. Action on a promissory note by H. Holienscliild against W. H. Shaffer and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring the case to this court. The statement of the case, as made by Gilkeson, P. J., is as follows : The defendant in error, H. Hohenschild, as the owner and holder, brought suit before a justice of the peace of Saline county upon the following promissory note : “$375. Salina, Kan., June 25, 1888. “Six months after date, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of Abbott & Hohenschild three hundred…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gilkeson, P. J. :
The errors assigned in this action are: “(1) The court erred in sustaining the petition in error of said H. Hohenschild, plaintiff in error, in said court; (2) the court erred in rendering judgment for said Hohenschild, plaintiff in error, in said court; (3) the court erred in not rendering judgment for the said W. H. Shaffer, ¥m. Hogben, and A. W. Krause, defendants in error, in said court.” Defendant in error contends that the errors complained of in this action are not reviewable in this court. We cannot agree with counsel on this…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Good v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kœhler v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Kline v. Bank of TescottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Stapleton v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Benham v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wiers v. TreeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Gardner v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899