Legal Opinion
CHUE v. Lehman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 4, 2009No. 4D09-128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.
Edna Ramos Chue appeals the trial court’s denial of her Motion to Recover Attorney’s Fees and Tax Costs and Motions for Sanctions under section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2008). The standard for reviewing the denial of a motion for attorney’s fees under section 57.105(1) is clear abuse of discretion. Nasser v. Nasser, 975 So.2d 531, 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
This appeal arises out of a complaint filed by Richard S. Lehman, individually, and Richard S. Lehman, P.A. against Chue and several other defendants for abuse of process and civil conspiracy. Lehman alleged that Chue and the other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. WISU Properties, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Bowen v. BrewerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Hustad v. Architectural Studio, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Nasser v. NasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mc Liberty Express v. All Points ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Wapnick v. Veterans Council of Indian River County, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Trust Mortgage, LLC v. Dina Ferlanti and Anthony FerlantiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Jenkins v. Plaza 3000, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Tedrow v. CannonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016