Legal Opinion

Rottenberg v. Cirillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Civil Court of the City of New York lacks jurisdiction to grant affirmative equitable relief to vacate and set aside a general release and satisfaction of judgment (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 15, subd. b; CCA, § 201 et seq.). Section 212 of the New York City Civil Court Act does not expand the jurisdiction of that court to include equitable jurisdiction not elsewhere -specifically conferred (Kwoczka v. Dry Dock Sav. Bank, 52 Misc 2d 67; Geiger Roofing Co. v. Thompson, 54 Misc 2d 718).

The order should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied without prejudice to a plenary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kwoczka v. Dry Dock Savings BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  2. Geiger Roofing Co. v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voccola v. ShillingNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Arroyo v. RosenbluthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  3. Guzzardo v. LanghorstCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API