Legal Opinion
United States v. Urena
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 17, 2013No. S5 11 Cr. 1032(PAE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Three defendants in this multi-defendant racketeering case (Carlos Urena, Juan Franco, and Limet Vasquez) have moved for an order requiring the Government to reveal the redacted portions of certain recorded 911 calls that the Government has provided to them in discovery. These calls relate to a murder charged in the Indictment as a predicate act of racketeering. Dkt. 730, 754. The redactions from these recordings consist of the names, and other identifying information, of the person(s) who placed these calls. Following defendants’…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. David StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AbdallaDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- State of Tennessee v. Susan Jo WallsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- United States v. Al FawwazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015