Legal Opinion
Lorentzson v. Rowell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 25, 1984No. 67799, 67800PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Chief Judge.
This is a case of medical malpractice (medical doctor-ophthalmologist), fraud and products liability brought against the plaintiff’s treating physician (as to the malpractice and fraud) and products liability against the manufacturer of the drug prescribed and used (allegedly a steroid). The uncontroverted facts disclose that Dr. Roger Rowell, the defendant doctor (ophthalmologist) treated the patient Clarence Lorentzson for a number of years. Such treatment consisted of prescription eyeglasses and treatment for scratching of both the left and right eye, the patient…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. GowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Sutlive v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Leagan v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hill v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Shved v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Hickey v. AskrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Smith, Miller & Patch v. LorentzsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Adair v. Baker Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.