Legal Opinion

Cmi Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Leemar Steel Co., Inc., an Ohio Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1984No. 82-1538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Leemar Steel Company (Leemar) appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of CMI Corporation (CMI) after trial to the court. CMI initiated this action seeking cancellation of a contract with Leemar and the return of money it had paid Leemar pursuant to the contract.

During the latter part of 1980, Leemar, an Ohio corporation, “went after” all the oil pump manufacturers to sell them its counterweight material. Daniel Malik, a Leemar salesman, initially contacted CMI, an Oklahoma corporation, on October 30, 1980, after finding CMI in the Dunn & Bradstreet Metalworking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rowe International, Inc. v. J-B Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Explorers Motor Home Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. George L. Cayce and Ana Jane Cayce v. Carter Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Darrow v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Johnson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aubrey's R. v. Center, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. Hci Chemicals (Usa), Inc. v. Henkel Kgaa, Defendant-Third Party v. Empresa Naviera Santa, S.A., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Midwest Generation, LLC v. Carbon Processing & Reclamation, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. China National Metal Products Import/Export Co. v. Apex Digital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
  5. Electrical Power Systems, Inc. v. Argo International Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API