Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 221, Calendar No. 35,924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The action is for damages for breach of a contract of employment.

March 23,1927, defendant board of education, then differently constituted in personnel, at a regular meeting adopted a resolution that plaintiff ‘ ‘be given a contract as superintendent of schools of the city of Fordson, for a term of three years, beginning July 1, 1927,” at a stated salary. There was dissension in the board, and the resolution was adopted by a vote of three to two after a resolution had been defeated by a like vote to renew the contract of the then superintendent.

April 2d, a contract of employment was executed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Crane v. School District Number SixMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jones v. School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hazen v. LercheMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Edgecomb v. Traverse City School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Royal Oak School District v. SchulmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Lansing Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Jacox v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API