Legal Opinion

United States v. Brace

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1998No. 96-50352PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

We granted rehearing en banc to consider whether, in order to rebut the entrapment defense raised by David Brace, the Government was required to prove “positional predisposition” on his part, a new requirement utilized in another circuit and by the panel; but, we conclude that we cannot address that subissue because it was neither preserved in district court nor even raised, for the first time, on appeal. Instead, at issue is simply whether, under our existing precedent, Brace was entrapped as a matter of law.

A jury convicted Brace and Shannon Knox of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Brace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. SquillacoteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Franks Investment Co. LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API