Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1987No. 8719DC21PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Even though plaintiff had the burden of proof, the order of summary judgment against defendant was properly entered and we affirm it, since the evidence as to defendant’s indebtedness was not only uncontradicted it was highly credible. Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343, 222 S.E. 2d 392 (1976); Blackwell v. Massey, 69 N.C. App. 240, 316 S.E. 2d 350 (1984). For in answering plaintiffs interrogatories defendant admitted under oath that she received electrical service from plaintiff during the period involved and signed a document acknowledging that she owed the bill sued for; there was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Blackwell v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Kleinfeldt v. Shoney's of Charlotte, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Capital Associated Industries v. Josh SteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Appeal of Stroh Brewery Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Woods v. Billy's AutomotiveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Jones v. RatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API