Knox v. Yingli Green Energy Holding Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [93]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED ■ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a putative class action for securities fraud under sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Plaintiffs Noe Barocio, Salvador Barocio, and Cindy Conybear allege that Defendant Yingli Green Energy Holding Company *956Limited (“Yingli”), a company that sells solar energy products, defrauded its investors by making false and misleading public statements about (1) the company’s involvement in a government subsidy program, and (2)…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bodri v. GoPro, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Royal Wulff Ventures LLC v. Primero Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Thant v. Rain Oncology Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025