Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
The plaintiffs (taxpayers) commenced an action in the county court, alleging that § 32 of the Revenue Enhancement Act of 2002 (Act), St. 2002, c. 186, which establishes an effective date of May 1, 2002, for the Act’s provision changing the taxation rate of long-term capital gains (gains from the sale or exchange of capital assets held more than one year), violates art. 44 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution because it imposes different rates of taxation during the 2002 calendar year on income derived from the same class of *421property. The parties submitted a statement of agreed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Barnes v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peterson v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Anderson v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- DeMoranville v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Anderson v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Demoranville v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009