Legal Opinion

Scott v. Day-Bristol Consolidated Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1914No. 2126PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County; E. J. L. Taber, Judge. Action by A. L. Scott against the Day-Bristol Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Norcross, J.:

Respondent brought an action in the Fourth judicial district court in and for the county of Lincoln against appellant to quiet title to a certain mining claim in the Bristol mining district, Lincoln County, known as the “Twenty-Eight-Thirty Lode,” and to perpetually enjoin appellant from asserting any claim or title whatever in or to said property adverse to the respondent or in any manner interfering with respondent’s possession thereof.

The complaint alleges that the defendant, appellant *300herein, is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Henry v. CarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Am. De Forest Wireless Tel. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. White Sewing Machine Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. York Et Ux v. StallingsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lawler v. GinochioNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Intermountain Veterinary Medical Ass'n v. Kiesling-Hess Finishing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Matter of Las Vegas Hilton Hotel FireNevada Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API