Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Winneshiek District Court.— Hon. A. N. Hob-son, Judge.' The defendant was convicted of having knowingly and wilfully resisted an officer in attempting to serve a search warrant, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Serviceprocess: r^sist^ncc * sufficiency of indictment. The indictment charged defendant with knowingly and wilfully resisting an officer in the service of a search warrant issued by Gr. W. Esty, Jr., a justice of the peace in and for Bloomfield township, Winneshiek county, Iowa, commanding “ any officer of Winneshiek county, Iowa, to make search on the person ox or dwelling house and barn or other out-building of said C. R. Moore in section 2, township 96, range 7, for about ten bushels of corn and three or four bushels of oats claimed to be owned by one Wm. Martens.” This identifies the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowrey v. GridleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  2. Metcalf v. WeedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  3. Wright v. DresselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. State v. KnowltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RandleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Saunders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Gandreau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  5. McSherry v. HeimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API