Legal Opinion

Tri-Star Electronics International Inc. v. Preci-Dip Durtal SA

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 9, 2010No. 2009-1337PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The district court denied the motion to dismiss this patent infringement suit for lack of standing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 1 and certified the ruling for interlocutory appeal. We accepted the certified question, 2 and now affirm the district court’s decision.

Background

On June 16, 1998, Mr. Leslie Kerek, an inventor employed by Tri-Star Electronics International, Inc., executed an assignment of the invention set forth in a specified patent application entitled “Socket Contact,” in accordance with his employment contract. The invention was assigned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Alvin, Ltd. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. In re All Kelley & Ferraro Asbestos CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Nicolson Pavement Company v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Cardiosom, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API