McLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of Elections
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERWIN, Senior District Judge.
On February 25, 1994, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter, the Court received plaintiffs’ objections to the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has appropriately reviewed plaintiffs’ objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s rulings which are affirmed and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rawls v. ZamoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- McLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Scott Mclaughlin v. North Carolina Board Of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995