Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of South Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1918No. 20063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A: Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an action to recover" for partially grading a street in South Omaha, under a contract with the city. The first cause of action is based upon the contract. The second count seeks to recover the reasonable value of grading, alleging that the city accepted and appropriated to its use all of the earth and labor performed, but refused to pay for the same: A general demurrer was filed to the petition, which was sustained, and the action dismissed. ■

The. petition alleges in substance that, following a petition filed by abutting property .owners, the city council of South Omaha passed an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lincoln Land Co. v. Village of GrantNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rogers v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Markey v. School District No. 18Nebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Nebraska Telephone Co. v. City of Red CloudNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Pomerene v. School District No. 56Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darnell v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. CAPITAL BRIDGE COMPANY v. County of SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Nebraska State Bank Liquidation Ass'n v. Village of BurtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. CAPITAL BRIDGE COMPANY v. County of SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API