Nebraska Telephone Co. v. City of Red Cloud
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Webster county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
The only question presented is whether the amended petition in this case states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In substance, its allegations are that the city of Red Cloud in 1906 decided to erect a municipal electric light plant, and that on or before September, 1906, said city entered into a valid contract with plaintiff, whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish and install for the city certain poles of the kind and character mentioned in a certain memorandum,-which ivas attached to and made a part of the amended petition; that the poles were necessary for the construction of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Village of OgalallaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Rogers v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Cathers v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Plattsmouth v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Murphy v. City of PlattsmouthNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. School District No. 64Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Darnell v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- W. L. Stickel Lumber Co. v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
- Humboldt County v. Incorporated Town of Dakota CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.