Legal Opinion

Nebraska Telephone Co. v. City of Red Cloud

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1913No. 17,127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Webster county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

The only question presented is whether the amended petition in this case states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In substance, its allegations are that the city of Red Cloud in 1906 decided to erect a municipal electric light plant, and that on or before September, 1906, said city entered into a valid contract with plaintiff, whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish and install for the city certain poles of the kind and character mentioned in a certain memorandum,-which ivas attached to and made a part of the amended petition; that the poles were necessary for the construction of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Village of OgalallaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rogers v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cathers v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Plattsmouth v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Murphy v. City of PlattsmouthNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. School District No. 64Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Darnell v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. W. L. Stickel Lumber Co. v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Humboldt County v. Incorporated Town of Dakota CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API