Shaw v. Wallis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
This cause having been put on the list of issues to be tried by a struck jury, the plaintiff now declined trying the same, whereupon the defendant moved for a rule for security for costs, the plaintiff living out of the state.
This was opposed by the plaintiff’s counsel, who alleged that such a rule could not legally be granted, and more particularly at this late stage of the cause.
The court declared, that the more modern authorities warranted the entering of such a rule, (r Term Rep. 267, 362. 4 Burr. 1177. 2 Term. Rep. 491.)
The\ e is a much stronger necessity for this practice in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kessler v. M'ConachySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Jeanes v. Fellows, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1942
- Shuttleworth v. DunlopNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881