Legal Opinion

Shuttleworth v. Dunlop

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1881Published

On motion to dismiss bill

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The defendant asks the dismissal of the complainant’s bill, because he has failed to obey an order requiring him to give security for costs. The complainant answers that the defendant has waived his right to security, and as it now appears that the order for security was obtained after such waiver had occurred, he should not be compelled to obey it in order to save his suit. The bill is filed to set aside a will for incapacity and fraud in its pro*490curement. The property in controversy consists almost entirely of houses and lots occupied by tenants. Shortly after the bill was…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Haney v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  3. Ex parte RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Adae & Co. v. ZangsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Heflin v. Rock Mills Manufacturing & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API