Legal Opinion

Woodstone Marble & Tile Co. v. Dunsmore Canyon Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1920No. Civ. No. 3249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this action plaintiff sought a decree adjudging it to be the owner of ten shares of stock in the Dunsmore Canyon Water Company and an order requiring said company to issue to it a certificate for the same.

The Dunsmore Canyon Water Company, together with Mrs. John Leenhouts and her husband, who were made parties defendant, suffered default. Defendant Garland filed an answer, and the result of the trial was a judgment against the plaintiff, from which it appeals on the judgment-roll, claiming that it is entitled to have judgment in its favor entered upon the findings.

The facts, as disclosed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Estate of Thomas v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Farmers' National Gold Bank v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yellowstone Valley Co. v. Associated Mortgage Investors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re Johnson's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Palo Verde Land & Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Kennard v. BinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Kinoshita v. North Denver BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API