Legal Opinion

Norton v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1935No. Civ. 10076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment following the granting of defendants’ motion for a non-suit.

For simplicity the respondent companies, one being the successor of the other, will be referred to herein merely as the “storage' company”. Appellant stored certain furniture and other personal property with the storage company on about June 2, 1930, under an agreement whereby appellant, in addition to a handling charge of $4 and a cartage charge of $5, agreed to pay a storage rate of $4 per month. Shortly thereafter a warehouse receipt was sent by mail to appellant, whose…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Kruger v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
  5. Hodges v. CondronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API