Legal Opinion
Hodges v. Condron
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 19, 1943No. 31008Published
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Condron was plaintiff and Hodges was defendant in’ the trial court. We refer to them herein as they appeared there.
In June, 1936, plaintiff, for hire, stored household goods with defendant warehouseman under usual written warehouse receipt and contract. Plaintiff then gave her address as 1115% South Main, Tulsa. Plaintiff moved to Dallas, Tex., and in the early months of 1937 advised defendant by letter of her new address. Same was then given as 619 N. Bishop, Dallas, Tex.
On August 16, 1937, defendant sent plaintiff by registered mail the statutory notice that her goods would be sold for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norton v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Mrs. W. R. Klappert Moving & Storage Warehouse v. MuehlenkampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Hackett v. Nelson Express & Storage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Moline v. Queensboro Storage Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934