Legal Opinion

Froman v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

Respondents and intervening plaintiff move to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the decree entered in the circuit court is not appealable under section 7-501, Oregon Code 1930, but is interlocutory and not a final order or decree from which an appeal may be taken.

This is a suit to require an accounting of one-half the residuary estate of William Jones, deceased, based upon the allegation that the defendant James Jones is a trustee ex maleficio of that certain portion of an estate which he promised and agreed to hold in trust for Forrest Jones. A decree was rendered adjudging the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winters v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Marquam v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Anderson v. HarjuOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Muellhaupt v. Joseph A. Strowbridge Estate Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Talbot & Casey, Inc. v. SimonOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McEwen v. McEwenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. American Timber & Trading Co. v. NiedermeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lyon v. MazerisOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Robertson v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Railton v. RedmarOregon Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API