Legal Opinion

Hallman v. Turns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1984No. 394PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment in ejectment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County.

We are presented here with a boundary dispute between defendants-appellants Clarence and Mary Turns and plaintiffs-appellees Marlin and William Hallman. The dispute involves a piece of mountainous, unimproved land situated in Fishing Creek Valley, Middle Paxton Township, Dauphin County. The parties do not dispute that appellees’ northern boundary line is also appellants’ southern boundary line, nor is there a dispute as to the location of the beginning and ending points of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Tops Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Hostetter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Babcock Lumber Co. v. FaustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Poffenberger v. GoldsteinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. COM., PENNSYLVANIA GAME COM'N v. UlrichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Becker v. WishardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API