Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka R. Co. v. Kirkbride

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1936No. 24497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant in error, as plaintiff, sued plaintiff in error in the Oklahoma county district court for the recovery of damages for personal injuries. The case comes here on appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff. The substance of plaintiff’s petition in the lower court is that while he was engaged in the performance of his duties •as head brakeman for the defendant railroad company, in the nighttime of June 27, 1929, and while engaged in switching cars at what is known as “the oid passing switch” at Hazel, Okla., he sustained the injuries complained of by reason of the negligence and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. KoskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. HoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API