Legal Opinion

Shoup v. Shoup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 113PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The six Judges who decided this case being equally divided the order is affirmed.

PRICE, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which JACOBS, P. J. and VAN der VOORT, J., join. SPAETH, J., files an opinion in support of remand in which CERCONE, J., joins; HOFFMAN, J., concurs in the result. HOFFMAN, J., dissents from an affirmance of the lower court’s order granting custody to the father because the record is insufficient to support an order disrupting the children’s relationship with their mother. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. In Re Wesley J. K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Morris v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hugo v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In Re Custody of TemosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API