Legal Opinion

Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 30, 1999No. 98-C-2085PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

754 So.2d 209 (1999)

Sara K. SMITH, et al.

v.

TOYS "R" US, INC., et al.

No. 98-C-2085.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 30, 1999.

Maxwell Gantt Kees, Sr., Charles Andrew O'Brien, III, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Applicant.

William Francis Bologna, Julien F. Jurgens, Habans, Bologna & Carrier, New Orleans, Counsel for Respondent.

Geoffrey Jacob Orr, Metairie, Counsel for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Amicus Curiae.

LEMMON, Justice.[*]

This is a "falling merchandise" case which raises the issue of the required proof, through direct and circumstantial evidence, of the existence of a hazardous condition on a…

Also in this document: Dissent · Victory; Dissent · Traylor.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Jordan v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Boudreaux v. American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Lewis v. Jazz Casino Co., L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Carr v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Gruver v. Kroger Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API