Koenig v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The intercourse, which resulted in the conception and birth of the child involved in this proceeding, occurred during the four weeks preceding October 15, 1932. During all of that period the complaining witness, Ruth Ellis, was a married woman, residing with her parents in the city of Fond du Lac; and her husband, Earl Ellis, resided about thirty-three miles from that city on a farm, where he worked while on parole after a conviction for abandonment. He had gone to neighboring farms and, at least once, to Fond du Lac.
As the child was conceived and born during the period of wedlock, it is,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mink v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Bianchi v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- O'Neil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Watts v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Shuman v. ShumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Briggs v. KellnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002