Legal Opinion
Chestnut Manor, Inc. v. Abraham
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 29, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The pláintiff sought recovery on a “guaranty” executed by the defendant of a note secured by a second mortgage. The case was submitted to *961the trial court upon a statement of agreed facts, and judgment was entered for the plaintiff. We affirm.
Mitchell J. Sikora, Jr., for the defendant. Warren F. Fitzgerald for the plaintiff.
On September 1,1959, trustees ofM&N Realty, owner of property in Brookline (“the property”), gave a note, secured by a second mortgage, in the amount of $155,000 to the plaintiff. There was at that time a $280,000 first mortgage on the property. On June 24, 1967, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charlestown Five Cents Savings Bank v. WolfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Doral Country Club, Inc. v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- American District Telegraph Co. v. SperosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hopping Brook TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- FDIC v. Hopping Brook TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997